Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

 

‭(Hidden)‬ Catalog-Item Reuse

Most States Opt Out of State-Run Health Insurance Exchange

One of the centerpieces of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was a requirement that states either establish and operate their own health insurance exchange or leave it up to the federal government. In all, 18 states and the District of Columbia submitted the necessary paperwork requesting to run their own programs.
Sponsored by
One of the centerpieces of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was a requirement that states either establish and operate their own health insurance exchange or leave it up to the federal government. In all, 18 states and the District of Columbia submitted the necessary paperwork requesting to run their own programs.
 
Health insurance exchanges are essentially online marketplaces for individuals and employers to purchase coverage through pre-approved qualified health plans with specific levels of covered benefits. The PPACA also calls for the exchanges to be used to determine eligibility for new subsidies (for taxpayers with incomes of up to 400% of the poverty level), Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program.
 
The Department of Health and Human Services was tasked with approving, conditionally approving or denying the applications submitted by the 19 jurisdictions (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia). Each exchange must be ready for open enrollment on Oct. 1, 2013 and fully operational on Jan. 1, 2014.
 
Most states chose not to pursue the establishment of a state-based exchange, so the federal government will establish exchanges in these remaining states and in any jurisdiction whose application is denied by HHS. The states that have elected not to create exchanges cite a variety of reasons for their decision including a lack of clear guidance from the federal government, the prohibitive cost associated with running an exchange and the political liability of appearing to comply with an unpopular law. These states have the option to establish their own exchange at a later date, but there is a one-year waiting period before an exchange for one of these states will be permitted to be operational.
 
States with federally run exchanges have the option of performing plan management and/or consumer assistance functions for the exchanges (under the “partnership exchange” model) or allowing the federal government to operate the exchange without any significant state involvement (commonly referred to as the “federally facilitated exchange” model).
 
States that intend to cooperate with HHS on the operation of a partnership exchange must submit an application for approval by Feb. 15, 2013. Several states—including Arkansas, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, North Carolina and West Virginia—are expected to seek such approval to operate one or both of the areas of responsibility available to states under the partnership model.
 
Margarita Tapia is Big “I” director of public affairs. 
Former Insurance Agent is Newest U.S. Senator
South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley appointed Rep. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), a former insurance agent, to fill the seat in the United States Senate recently vacated by Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.).
 
When Scott first announced that he was running for South Carolina’s first congressional district in 2009, the Big “I” was pleased that an agent with experience with the independent agency system was running for Congress and supported his campaign. The Big “I” federal political action committee, InsurPac, supported Rep. Scott’s bids in 2010 and in 2012.
 
Scott was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2010 and quickly rose through the ranks. He was one of only two freshmen to be elected to a leadership role for the 112th Congress.
 
Scott has a proven track record of supporting small business issues and has long been hailed as a fiscal conservative and steward of taxpayer dollars by numerous organizations.
 
Scott was elected to the Charleston County Council in 1995. He served on the council for 13 years and became chairman in 2007. In 2008, he was elected to the South Carolina House of Representatives and was elected chairman of the Freshman Caucus as well as house whip. Scott earned a bachelor’s degree in political science at Charleston Southern University.
 
—M.T.